Reporting by the press on current events (Art. 5.3(c) 2nd part InfoSoc)
This (optional) exception or limitation allows reproduction, communication to the public or making available to the public - by any user, of works or other subject matter (other than databases and software) in connection with the reporting of current events. The permitted use must be to the extent justified by the informatory purpose. The source, including the author's name, must be indicated unless this turns out to be impossible.
The EU Court of Justice gave an autonomous interpretation of the requirements of the provision in Spiegel Online (C-516/17). The use under the exception could only be conditioned by i) the indication of the source; ii) the use of the work to the extent justified by the informatory purpose and iii) the use ‘in connection with the reporting of current events’. The action of 'reporting' must be understood as that of providing information on a current event, with no obligation to analyse such an event in detail. A ‘current event’ is an event that, at the time at which it is reported, is of informatory interest to the public. ‘To the extent justified by the informatory purpose’ means that the use of the protected work must not be extended beyond the confines of what is necessary to achieve the informatory purpose. The ‘connection with the reporting of current events’ must be interpreted on a case-by-case basis by the national court per the usual meaning in everyday language, the legislative context and the purposes of the norm.
This exception has been implemented in the following Member States:
- In Croatia in Article 201 of the Copyright and Related Rights Act
- In The Netherlands in Artikel 16a Auteurswet
- In Ireland in Section 221(1)(b) of the Copyright and Related Rights Act
- In Romania in Article 35, para 2, (c) of the Law No 8/1996 on copyright and related rights
- In Slovakia in Section 39(2) of the Copyright Act
- In Belgium in Article XI.190, 1° of the Code of Economic Law (CEL).
- In Spain in Article 35(1) of Law 23/2006
- In Estonia in §19, para 4 of the Copyright Act
- In Czech Republic in Section 34(b) of the Copyright Act
- In Finland in §25(1), p.2 and §25b of the Copyright Act
- In Sweden in Articles 23(3) and 25 of the Act (1960:729) on copyright in literary and artistic works
- In Portugal in Article 75(2)(d) Código do Direito de Autor e dos Direitos Conexos
- In Hungary in Section 37 of the Copyright Act
- In Slovenia in Article 48(1) p. 1, 2 and 4 of the Copyright and Related Rights Act
- In Latvia in Section 20, paras 1 and 3 and of the Copyright Act
- In Luxembourg in Article 10, 3° de la Loi du 18 avril 2001 sur les droits d’auteur, les droits voisins et les bases de données
- In Poland in Article 25, para 1, (b) of the Copyright and Related Rights Act
- In Germany in Section 50 of the Act on Copyright and Related Rights (UrhG)
- In Italy in Article 65(2) of Law for the Protection of Copyright and Neighbouring Rights
- In Lithuania in Article 24(1), p.2 of the Law of 18 May 1999 No VIII- 1185 on Copyright and Related Rights
- In Austria in Section 42c of the Federal Law on Copyright in Literary and Artistic Works and Related Rights
- In Bulgaria in Article 24, para 1, p.6 of the Copyright and Neighbouring Rights Law (Член 24, ал.1, т.6 от Закона за авторското право и сродните му права)
- In Greece in Article 25 of Law 2121/1993, Intellectual Property, Related Rights and Cultural Issues
- In France in Article L122-5, 9° of the Intellectual Property Code
- In Malta in Article 9(1)j of Chapter 415 of the Laws of Malta
- In Denmark in §23(2) and §25 of the Copyright Act